Jeff Probst wrote:Speak of the devil, Kim just popped in. Kim have you been around much, I know you had to miss yesterday. Particularly nervous because of this?
That was two days ago

Jeff Probst wrote:Speak of the devil, Kim just popped in. Kim have you been around much, I know you had to miss yesterday. Particularly nervous because of this?
Mia wrote:And Jeff does it again...
The Jury wrote:From this point in the game, is it more important to take the people who are your friends, but may be stronger, to the end, or people who you may not like, but would be easy to beat in the final vote?
Jeff Probst wrote:Bobby Jon, has anyone surprised you in challenges? Do you think anyone has either hidden their challenge abilities in the past and now that it's individual have stepped their game up? Or conversely, do you think anyone is playing down their challenge abilities to seem less threatening?
Do either of those things make you more wary of those individuals.
Jeff Probst wrote:Here's an important question for you all to answer becuase it comes from the jury and they are always watching.The Jury wrote:From this point in the game, is it more important to take the people who are your friends, but may be stronger, to the end, or people who you may not like, but would be easy to beat in the final vote?
Jeff Probst wrote:Tom, it's clearly no longer about tribal loyalty at this point, does that make the game more scary or does it give you more options?
Mia wrote:Can the jury only see our tribals, or can they see more?
Tom wrote:Jeff Probst wrote:Tom, it's clearly no longer about tribal loyalty at this point, does that make the game more scary or does it give you more options?
I think it basically means that you have to rely more on the bonds you've made with individuals than one alliance as a tribe. So it's good if you feel confident in your social game and connections, but not as good if you've just been relying on having your tribe carry you through the game.
Ibrehem wrote:Jeff Probst wrote:Here's an important question for you all to answer becuase it comes from the jury and they are always watching.The Jury wrote:From this point in the game, is it more important to take the people who are your friends, but may be stronger, to the end, or people who you may not like, but would be easy to beat in the final vote?
Friends, but nobody else here seems to think so.
Jeff Probst wrote:Here's an important question for you all to answer becuase it comes from the jury and they are always watching.The Jury wrote:From this point in the game, is it more important to take the people who are your friends, but may be stronger, to the end, or people who you may not like, but would be easy to beat in the final vote?
Mia wrote:Also, mad respect for Jolanda being the only juror to consistently be here.
Mia wrote:Why does nobody seem to think that? You guys seem to think that there is some sort of core alliance, so wouldn't that go against what you just said?
Chad wrote:Did Jeff have to pee?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests